Submit a comment
Abstract
Successful allograft-specific tolerance induction would eliminate the need for daily immunosuppression and improve posttransplant quality of life. Adoptive cell therapy with regulatory T cells expressing donor-specific chimeric antigen receptors (CAR Tregs) is a promising strategy but, as monotherapy, cannot prolong survival with allografts with multiple MHC mismatches. Using an HLA-A2–transgenic haplo-mismatched heart transplantation model in immunocompetent C57BL/6 recipients, we showed that HLA-A2–specific CAR (A2.CAR) Tregs were able to synergize with a low dose of anti-CD154 to enhance graft survival. Using haplo-mismatched grafts expressing the 2W-OVA transgene and tetramer-based tracking of 2W- and OVA-specific T cells, we showed that in mice with accepted grafts, A2.CAR Tregs inhibited donor-specific T cell, B cell, and antibody responses and promoted a substantial increase in endogenous FOXP3+ Tregs with indirect donor specificity. By contrast, in mice where A2.CAR Tregs failed to prolong graft survival, FOXP3– A2.CAR T cells preferentially accumulated in rejecting allografts, and endogenous donor-specific responses were not controlled. This study therefore provides evidence for synergy between A2.CAR Tregs and CD154 blockade to promote infectious tolerance in immunocompetent recipients of haplo-mismatched heart grafts and defines features of A2.CAR Tregs when they fail to reshape host immunity toward allograft tolerance.
Authors
Samarth S. Durgam, Isaac Rosado-Sánchez, Dengping Yin, Madeleine Speck, Majid Mojibian, Ismail Sayin, Grace E. Hynes, Maria-Luisa Alegre, Megan K. Levings, Anita S. Chong
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
