Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Mapping vascular plasticity during fibrogenesis identifies fibrosis-associated endothelial cells in early-stage liver disease
Christina Gkantsinikoudi, Joshua P. Dignam, Raju Kumar, Elliot Jokl, Meenakshi Rana, Wenhao Li, Maryna Samus, Stephanie Landi, Varinder S. Athwal, Timothy J. Kendall, Antal Rot, Jonathan A. Fallowfield, Karen Piper Hanley, William Alazawi, Neil P. Dufton
Christina Gkantsinikoudi, Joshua P. Dignam, Raju Kumar, Elliot Jokl, Meenakshi Rana, Wenhao Li, Maryna Samus, Stephanie Landi, Varinder S. Athwal, Timothy J. Kendall, Antal Rot, Jonathan A. Fallowfield, Karen Piper Hanley, William Alazawi, Neil P. Dufton
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Hepatology Vascular biology

Mapping vascular plasticity during fibrogenesis identifies fibrosis-associated endothelial cells in early-stage liver disease

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Vascular plasticity is a crucial biological asset enabling our bodies to rapidly adapt to infections and acute inflammation. However, repeated insults during chronic disease can result in these vascular adaptations becoming irreversible, thereby driving disease progression and fibrosis. This study aimed to understand if phenotypic changes in endothelial cell (EC) identity could be indicative of progressive fibrosis and thereby offer diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities for patients with metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). We integrated high-resolution imaging and proteomic and transcriptomic analysis, which collectively highlighted a central role for endothelial-mesenchymal transition–induced (EndMT-induced) EC plasticity in the derivation of fibrosis-associated EC (FAEC). We demonstrated that: (a) full-spectrum flow cytometry can provide new opportunities to categorize and phenotype EC subpopulations; (b) 2 distinct EndMT-derived FAEC subpopulations expanded during fibrogenesis (THY1.2+ICAM1+ and TAGLN+MCAM+ EC) that displayed unique immunomodulatory and metabolic phenotypes; (c) TAGLN+ FAEC are a conserved, profibrotic cell type that arose at early stages of MASLD; and (d) increased hepatic expression of TAGLN was significantly associated with detrimental patient outcomes at all stages of liver disease. This study paves the way for the development of FAEC-specific diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to tackle progressive fibrotic disease.

Authors

Christina Gkantsinikoudi, Joshua P. Dignam, Raju Kumar, Elliot Jokl, Meenakshi Rana, Wenhao Li, Maryna Samus, Stephanie Landi, Varinder S. Athwal, Timothy J. Kendall, Antal Rot, Jonathan A. Fallowfield, Karen Piper Hanley, William Alazawi, Neil P. Dufton

×

Figure 9

Derivation of THY1.2+ expanded FAEC from reduced EC clusters through acquisition of EndMT traits.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Derivation of THY1.2+ expanded FAEC from reduced EC clusters through acq...
(A and B) Contour plots of clusters 1, 3, 9, and 10 for ICAM1 versus LYVE1 and THY1.2 versus LY6A. Arrow denotes the shifting phenotypic profile of the clusters for the different treatment groups. (C) Wishbone trajectory analysis of clusters 1, 3, 9, and 10 for THY1.2 (red), LYVE1 (blue) and ICAM1 (green). (D) Heatmap displaying the expression profile of the Fibrogenic branch (top panel) or Recovery branch (bottom panel) for THY1.2, LYVE1, and ICAM1. (E) Schematic summarizing the trajectory and profile of clusters 1, 3, 9, and 10 during fibrogenesis and tissue recovery. n = 5 per group.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts