Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Effect of ligands and HIV latency-reversing agents on estrogen receptor α in CD4+ T cells
Cristina Ceriani, Priya Khetan, Anthony Abeyta-Lopez, Kena J. Lemu, Prachi Meher, Brigitte Allard, Katherine S. James, Anne-Marie W. Turner, David M. Margolis, Nancie M. Archin
Cristina Ceriani, Priya Khetan, Anthony Abeyta-Lopez, Kena J. Lemu, Prachi Meher, Brigitte Allard, Katherine S. James, Anne-Marie W. Turner, David M. Margolis, Nancie M. Archin
View: Text | PDF
Research Article AIDS/HIV Cell biology Infectious disease

Effect of ligands and HIV latency-reversing agents on estrogen receptor α in CD4+ T cells

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The estrogen receptor (ER) is hypothesized to directly influence HIV transcription and latency but is also critical for immune signaling. However, the mechanisms of action of the ER in immune cells in the context of HIV are limited, and relevant to HIV cure strategies, the influence of latency reversal agents (LRAs) on the ER pathway are unknown. We evaluated (a) the effect of estrogen (E2) on the nuclear translocation of ERα in CD4+ T cells; (b) the ability of Fulvestrant, a selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), and ARV-471, a potent, PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC) selective ERα degrader to modulate ERα; and c) the effect of different classes of LRAs on ERα signaling. In contrast to what has been demonstrated in oncology, E2 did not induce ERα nuclear translocation in CD4+ T cells. Similarly, neither Fulvestrant nor ARV-471 induced degradation of ERα in CD4+ T cells. LRAs significantly downregulated ERα gene and protein expression in both PBMCs and CD4+ T cells. Collectively, our results suggest that estrogen influences on HIV transcription are not likely a consequence of canonical nuclear ERα mechanisms. The consequences of LRA downregulation of ERα, a protein important for immune signaling, warrant further investigation.

Authors

Cristina Ceriani, Priya Khetan, Anthony Abeyta-Lopez, Kena J. Lemu, Prachi Meher, Brigitte Allard, Katherine S. James, Anne-Marie W. Turner, David M. Margolis, Nancie M. Archin

×

Figure 3

Comparison ERα degradation in CD4+ T cells vs T-47D.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Comparison ERα degradation in CD4+ T cells vs T-47D.
(A and B) Represent...
(A and B) Representative WB of ERα total protein from CD4+ T cells of seronegative donors after 24 hours of Fulvestrant or ARV-471 treatment at indicated concentrations. (C) Quantification of ERα total protein expression from CD4+ T cells after 6 or 24 hours of Fulvestrant (1 μM) treatment from n = 8 donors or ARV-471 treatment from n = 3 donors. (D and E) Representative WB of ERα total protein from T-47D cells after Fulvestrant or ARV-471 treatment at indicated concentrations at 2 hours post-treatment. (F) Quantification of ERα total protein from T-47D cells after Fulvestrant (1 μM) treatment 6 hours (n = 3) and 24 hours (n = 5) time points or after 6 hours ARV-471 treatment (n = 3) at 1 nM and 10 nM. Each point represents an individual sample. Geometric mean with geometric SD shown for C and F. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.005. One-sample t test was performed by comparing each treatment to the theoretical mean at the same time point.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts