Usage Information
Abstract
Embryo implantation is crucial for ensuring a successful pregnancy outcome and subsequent child health. The intrauterine environment during the peri-implantation period shows drastic changes in gene expression and cellular metabolism in response to hormonal stimuli and reciprocal communication with embryos. Here, we performed spatial transcriptomic analysis to elucidate the mechanisms underlying embryo implantation. Transcriptome data revealed that lipid metabolism pathways, especially arachidonic acid–related (AA-related) ones, were enriched in the embryo-receptive luminal epithelia. Cyclooxygenases (COXs), rate-limiting enzymes involved in prostaglandin production by AA, were spatiotemporally regulated in the vicinity of embryos during implantation, but the role of each COX isozyme in the uterus for successful pregnancy was unclear. We established uterine-specific COX2-knockout (uKO) and COX1/uterine COX2-double-KO (COX1/COX2-DKO) mice. COX2 uKO caused deferred implantation with failed trophoblast invasion, resulting in subfertility with reduced pregnancy rates and litter sizes. COX1/COX2 DKO induced complete infertility, owing to abrogated embryo attachment. These results demonstrate that both isozymes have distinct roles during embryo implantation. Spatial transcriptome and lipidome analyses revealed unique profiles of prostaglandin synthesis by each COX isozyme and spatiotemporal expression patterns of downstream receptors throughout the endometrium. Our findings reveal previously unappreciated roles of COXs at the fetomaternal interface to establish early pregnancy.
Authors
Shizu Aikawa, Mitsunori Matsuo, Shun Akaeda, Yukihiko Sugimoto, Makoto Arita, Yosuke Isobe, Yuki Sugiura, Shu Taira, Rae Maeda, Ryoko Shimizu-Hirota, Norihiko Takeda, Daiki Hiratsuka, Xueting He, Chihiro Ishizawa, Rei Iida, Yamato Fukui, Takehiro Hiraoka, Miyuki Harada, Osamu Wada-Hiraike, Yutaka Osuga, Yasushi Hirota
Usage data is cumulative from August 2025 through August 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,841 | 377 |
| 470 | 101 | |
| Figure | 838 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 905 | 46 |
| Citation downloads | 352 | 0 |
| Totals | 5,406 | 524 |
| Total Views | 5,930 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
