Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
The pivotal role of the Hes1/Piezo1 pathway in the pathophysiology of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis
Nagahiro Ochiai, Yuki Etani, Takaaki Noguchi, Taihei Miura, Takuya Kurihara, Yuji Fukuda, Hidetoshi Hamada, Keisuke Uemura, Kazuma Takashima, Masashi Tamaki, Teruya Ishibashi, Shohei Ito, Satoshi Yamakawa, Takashi Kanamoto, Seiji Okada, Ken Nakata, Kosuke Ebina
Nagahiro Ochiai, Yuki Etani, Takaaki Noguchi, Taihei Miura, Takuya Kurihara, Yuji Fukuda, Hidetoshi Hamada, Keisuke Uemura, Kazuma Takashima, Masashi Tamaki, Teruya Ishibashi, Shohei Ito, Satoshi Yamakawa, Takashi Kanamoto, Seiji Okada, Ken Nakata, Kosuke Ebina
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Bone biology Therapeutics

The pivotal role of the Hes1/Piezo1 pathway in the pathophysiology of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) lacks fully effective treatments. This study investigated the role of Piezo1, a mechanosensitive ion channel component 1, in GIOP. We found reduced Piezo1 expression in cortical bone osteocytes from patients with GIOP and a GIOP mouse model. Yoda1, a Piezo1 agonist, enhanced the mechanical stress response and bone mass and strength, which were diminished by dexamethasone (DEX) administration in GIOP mice. RNA-seq revealed that Yoda1 elevated Piezo1 expression by activating the key transcription factor Hes1, followed by enhanced CaM kinase II and Akt phosphorylation in osteocytes. This improved the lacuno-canalicular network and reduced sclerostin production and the receptor activator of NF-κB/osteoprotegerin ratio, which were mitigated by DEX. Comparative analysis of mouse models and human GIOP cortical bone revealed downregulation of mechanostimulated osteogenic factors, such as osteocrin, and cartilage differentiation markers in osteoprogenitor cells. In human periosteum-derived cells, DEX suppressed differentiation into osteoblasts, but Yoda1 rescued this effect. Our findings suggest that reduced Piezo1 expression and activity in osteocytes and periosteal cells contribute to GIOP, and Yoda1 may offer a novel therapeutic approach by restoring mechanosensitivity.

Authors

Nagahiro Ochiai, Yuki Etani, Takaaki Noguchi, Taihei Miura, Takuya Kurihara, Yuji Fukuda, Hidetoshi Hamada, Keisuke Uemura, Kazuma Takashima, Masashi Tamaki, Teruya Ishibashi, Shohei Ito, Satoshi Yamakawa, Takashi Kanamoto, Seiji Okada, Ken Nakata, Kosuke Ebina

×

Figure 4

Yoda1 reverses the glucocorticoid-induced attenuation of mechanically driven bone responses.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Yoda1 reverses the glucocorticoid-induced attenuation of mechanically dr...
(A) Protocol for tibial mechanical loading and DEX and Yoda1 administration schedule: mice received DEX (1 mg/kg s.c.), Yoda1 (5 μmol/kg i.p.), or vehicle (distilled water s.c. and 5% ethanol i.p.) in 5 injections over 1 week. The left tibiae were subjected to axial mechanical loading 2–3 times weekly using an ElectroForce 5500 system. Each loading session consisted of 40 cycles of a trapezoidal waveform applying −13 N for 0.1 seconds, with 10-second intervals. Experimental groups consisted of Vehicle, DEX, and DEX+Yoda1. (B) Microcomputed tomography scans of both cortical and trabecular bone sections (scale bar: 250 μm). (C) Microcomputed tomography evaluations, including BV/TV, Ct. Th., Tb. N., and Po. Tot (n = 6 for Vehicle, n = 9 for DEX, and n = 9 for DEX+Yoda1). (D) Images of tetracycline and calcein labeling at ×100 magnification (scale bars: 5 μm). Labeling durations were 2 days for tetracycline and 1 day for calcein. (E) MAR. (F) BFR. For panels E and F, n = 3 for each group. (G and H) IHC for osteocalcin expression. (G) Periosteal bone surfaces, demarcated by a dashed line (original magnification, ×20; scale bars: 200 μm). (H) The ratio of osteocalcin+ cells on the periosteal surface. (I and J) TRAP staining. (I) TRAP+ cells were identified with arrowheads at ×20 magnification (scale bars: 20 μm). (J) Quantification of TRAP+ cells per bone surface area. For panels H and J, n = 3–4 for each group. All data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using a 1-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. NS, not significant.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts