Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
VEGF188 promotes corneal reinnervation after injury
James T. Brash, Laura Denti, Christiana Ruhrberg, Franziska Bucher
James T. Brash, Laura Denti, Christiana Ruhrberg, Franziska Bucher
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Ophthalmology

VEGF188 promotes corneal reinnervation after injury

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF) induces angiogenesis and vascular hyperpermeability in ocular tissues and is therefore a key therapeutic target for eye conditions in which these processes are dysregulated. In contrast, the therapeutic potential of VEGF’s neurotrophic roles in the eye has remained unexploited. In particular, it is not known whether modulating levels of any of the 3 major alternatively spliced VEGF isoforms might provide a therapeutic approach to promote neural health in the eye without inducing vascular pathology. Here, we have used a variety of mouse models to demonstrate differences in overall VEGF levels and VEGF isoform ratios across tissues in the healthy eye. We further show that VEGF isoform expression was differentially regulated in retinal versus corneal disease models. Among the 3 major isoforms — termed VEGF120, VEGF164, and VEGF188 — VEGF188 was upregulated to the greatest extent in injured cornea, where it was both necessary and sufficient for corneal nerve regeneration. Moreover, topical VEGF188 application further promoted corneal nerve regeneration without inducing pathological neovascularization. VEGF isoform modulation should therefore be explored further for its potential in promoting neural health in the eye.

Authors

James T. Brash, Laura Denti, Christiana Ruhrberg, Franziska Bucher

×

Figure 4

VEGF188 is essential and sufficient for reinnervation of injured cornea.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
VEGF188 is essential and sufficient for reinnervation of injured cornea....
(A) Experimental protocol of the corneal abrasion assay in mice expressing specific VEGF isoforms only (Vegfaxxx/fl Cag-CreERT2). Mice of the indicated genotypes and pooled littermate controls (Vegfa+/+, Vegfa+/fl, Vegfa+/+ Cag-CreERT2) were injected intraperitoneally (IP) with tamoxifen on P21 and P35. Central corneal epithelial abrasion was performed on P49 and immunostaining of corneal flat mounts on P56; the dashed circle indicates the central area that was used for neurite quantification, with the 2 patterns of neurite regeneration illustrated in the higher-magnification image. (B) TUBB3 immunostaining of D7 corneal flat mounts to visualize subbasal plexus regeneration in tamoxifen-induced Vegfafl/xxx Cag-CreERT2 mice (xxx/fl;Cre+) versus littermate controls. Scale bars: 50 μm. (C) Neurite length in the injured area of Vegfaxxx/fl Cag-CreERT2 mice (mean ± SD); n = 9 control mice, n = 5 120/fl;Cre+ mice, n = 4 164/fl;Cre+ mice, n = 4 188/fl;Cre+ mice; each data point represents the value for 1 cornea from 1 mouse. *P ≤ 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.001; 1-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple-comparisons test.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts